Peer Review Sheet: Assignment Two: Draft One

 

Peer Reviewer: Hailey Jenkins

Author of Paper: Madyson Mahler

Title of Paper: Religion and Revenge

 

What is the writer’s thesis?

 

By evaluating these, we will be able to see King Charles' role in the assassination of French Huguenots and why he stepped in and instigated a bloody revenge.

 

Restate the thesis in your words.

When one evaluates the sources, they are able to learn more about why King Charles instigated such a bloody revenge

 

What are three points, claims, or ideas in the paper for which you need further clarification to understand the writer’s intention?

1. Why did the death of Huguenot leadership trigger the death of so many Protestants?

2. The quote from Saint Benedict could be explained a little better

3. Why did the King’s representatives listen to him when he told them to kill people

 

What are three points, claims or ideas in the paper that you would like to know more about?

​​

1. What actually happened during this massacre (How many dead, etc.)

2. How fast was the protestant religion growing?

3. King Charles’ past (what drove him to this)

 

Is the writer on track to thoroughly demonstrate how their argument is fully supported? Why or why not?

 

Yes, the general set up of her paper is very good. She has a good use of sources, and good ratio of researched information and other stuff.

​

What are two things that you think the writer needs to work on for their next draft?

1. Possibly giving more context and/or explanations of the quotes that are used

2. Page breaks? At pages 2 and 3

 

What are two things the writer does well in this current draft?

Very good use of academic sources. They’re spaced out well, and support her claims well.